TOBACCO
ISSUES.COM



NATO is a
supporting
member of
"We Card"

November 3, 2006

 

 

A Newsletter of the National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc.

October 2009


FDA Tobacco Regulations Punctuated by Lawsuits

W

hen NATO warned members of Congress that legislation granting the FDA the power to ban color tobacco advertising violated the First Amendment free speech protections afforded to product advertising, a majority of representatives and senators chose not to listen.  The result was a federal lawsuit filed by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Conwood Company, Commonwealth Brands, Lorillard, National Tobacco Company, and Discount Tobacco City & Lottery against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration seeking to protect the constitutional right of tobacco manufacturers and retailers to communicate to adults through tobacco product advertising.

D

espite assurances from the new director of the FDA’s Tobacco Products Center during “Listening Session” conference calls that the agency planned to communicate openly with the tobacco industry about implementing the new tobacco regulations, the FDA issued a letter on September 14th notifying the industry about the ban on flavored cigarettes which included a sentence that other flavored tobacco products may also be banned.  The result was a federal lawsuit filed by Kretek International against the FDA seeking an injunction against banning flavored little cigars.

 

A

 third lawsuit has also been filed in federal court by BBK Tobacco & Foods, d/b/a HBI International seeking to protect the right to sell flavored cigarette rolling papers that are sold fda pr phrmain separate packages.  While the new FDA law bans flavored cigarettes and their component parts including the tobacco, filter and paper, the law does not specifically refer to a ban on flavored rolling papers that are separately packaged.

T

hese lawsuits were all filed in a six week period from the end of August to the middle of October and demonstrate not only that the FDA lacks a fundamental understanding of different tobacco products, but is willing to proceed with implementing new tobacco regulations before communicating with those in the tobacco industry that are directly affected by such regulations.  If the past six weeks of confusion over the new tobacco regulations followed by the filing of three federal lawsuits is any indication, additional litigation may certainly be the case as more and more of the tobacco regulations are implemented.   

 

 

 

   
 

 

 President's Message

Political Participation Vital

With states continuing to look to tobacco products for additional revenue, and now Congress enacting both a significant increase in the federal cigarette and tobacco tax rate and new FDA tobacco regulations, it is imperative for NATO members to become actively involved and politically engaged on tobacco legislative issues.

  This double exposure of state tobacco legislation magnified by federal tobacco taxation and regulation will require even more human resources to fight this continued assault on the tobacco industry.  By more “human resources”, I mean each NATO member will need to commit additional time to respond to higher cigarette and tobacco taxes plus more restrictive tobacco regulations.

  Part of this greater involvement on tobacco issues will involve educating our customers about these legislative threats and encouraging them to become politically active as well.  Remember, NATO’s legislative staff provides each member the necessary tools in the form of legislative alerts that can be provided to customers to make the task of contacting an elected official as simple as dialing the legislator’s phone number.

  Moreover, when I say that there will be the threat of more restrictive regulations, please recall that the new FDA regulations include a provision that allows any federal agency (other than the FDA), or any state, county or city government to adopt a law or regulation “prohibiting the sale, distribution, possession, exposure to, access to, advertising and promotion of, or use of tobacco products by individuals of any age.”  The vote this month by the New York City Council to ban all flavored tobacco products except menthol cigarettes, pipe and hookah tobacco is further evidence of this prohibitionist mindset. To fight such a risk, political involvement is no longer an optional task, but an absolute necessity.

-Andrew Kerstein, NATO President

 
   

 

Board Candidate Request

N

ATO members are encouraged to consider being a candidate for a NATO board of director seat.  This November, NATO members will be voting to elect five retailers and five manufacturers to serve a two year term on the NATO board of directors.  To be eligible for a board seat, a candidate must be an owner, partner, shareholder, officer or employee of a NATO member and make a commitment to attend board meetings and participate as a member on one or more board committees.    The board meets four times a year (two times by conference call and two in-person meetings).  Please call NATO Executive Director Tom Briant at 1-866-869-8888 by November 10th if you would be interested in being a candidate for a NATO board seat. 


Praise for NATO E-News

R

ecently, more than one NATO member has indicated that the NATO E-News Bulletin is one of the best sources of information on current tobacco issues and NATO’s legislative efforts.  If you are not receiving the E-News Bulletins, please call the NATO office at 1-866-869-8888 or e-mail the NATO staff at info@natocentral.org to be placed on the E-News distribution list.  The E-News is your one stop source for tobacco industry information.


 

   
 

  2009 State Tobacco Legislative Summary

Once again this year, numerous states looked to cigarette and tobacco products for additional revenue.  With many states facing budget deficits, cigarette and tobacco taxes continued to be a target for legislators to partially solve revenue shortfalls.  However, as NATO has informed legislators nationwide, the continued reliance on and increasing of cigarette and tobacco taxes has reached a point of diminishing returns in numerous states.  That is, further increases in the tax rates result in the state treasury either collecting less revenue than before the tax rate increase or failing to come close to the projected revenue estimate.

Cigarette Tax Increases:  18 Defeated vs. 14 Passed

Cigarette Tax Increases Defeated (Per Pack)

Cigarette Tax Increases Passed (Per Pack)

 

Alabama :  32.5¢                     New Mexico :  $1.00

Georgia :  $1.00                        Oregon :  60¢

Kansas :  95¢                           South Carolina :  50¢

Louisiana :  50¢ to $1.00         Tennessee :  20¢  

Maine :  $1.00                           Utah :  $1.31       

Maryland :  75¢                       Virginia :  89¢

Minnesota :  $1.00                    Washington :  $1.00             

Missouri :  16¢                         West Virginia   65¢

Montana :  17¢                         Wyoming :  50¢

 

Arkansas : 56¢                              North Carolina :  10¢

Connecticut :  $1.00                    Pennsylvania :  25¢

Delaware : 45¢                             Rhode Island :  $1.00

Florida : $1.00                              Vermont :  25¢

Hawaii : $1.00 over 3 years         Wisconsin :  75¢

Kentucky : 30¢

Mississippi : 50¢

New Hampshire : 45¢

New Jersey : 12.5¢

 

OTP Tax Increases:  15 Defeated vs. 17 Passed

Legislation to raise tax rates on other tobacco products was defeated or failed in fifteen states and passed in fourteen states.  The states where OTP tax increases failed included Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia.

The seventeen states that enacted higher OTP taxes or changed the method of moist snuff taxation included the following: Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania (only little cigars taxed at $1.60/pack), Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

State Smoking Restrictions:  7 Defeated vs. 4 Passed

  Four states enacted new or modified smoking restrictions whereas bills to restrict smoking failed in seven other states.  Those states enacting smoking restrictions included North Carolina (no smoking in public places and workplaces), Vermont (extended the current smoking ban to all workplaces), Virginia (prohibits smoking in bars, restaurants or lounges except in specially ventilated rooms), and Wisconsin (no smoking in bars, restaurants and workplaces except outdoor patios). 

At the same time, proposed smoking restrictions failed in Alabama , Kansas , Louisiana , Missouri , Oregon , Texas and Wyoming .  In South Dakota , a statewide smoking ban prohibiting smoking in public places and workplaces passed the legislature, but must now be placed as a question on an upcoming general election ballot.

 

 

   

 

 

 

Save the Date: 2010 NATO Dinner

N

ATO members should mark their 2010 calendars and save Tuesday, March 2, 2010 to attend the NATO Annual Awards Dinner at the Las Vegas Hilton Hotel.  This annual extravaganza brings together more than 300 guests from NATO manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer members to celebrate the tobacco industry’s efforts and successes.

Cusano Cigars Honored

A

t the recent Smoker Friendly International Tobacco Festival, Cusano Cigars/Dom Rey Cigars was presented with the Smoker Friendly Visionary Award for 2009.  This award is presented to the company that has seen and acted upon the potential in partnering with Smoker Friendly International to build each of their respective businesses.

Save the Date: 2010 TPE Show

The other important event for NATO members to place on their calendars is the 2010 Tobacco Plus Expo Trade Show which returns to Las Vegas on March 3-4, 2010 . New educational seminars for retailers and a trade show floor with hundreds of

 

   

 

tobacco product exhibitors are two of the many reasons to plan to attend.  Learn more about the show by visiting www.tobaccoplusexpo.com.

 

 

 

 

Fighting for Retailers; Protecting the Industry


 

   

 

To top of newsletter